http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-25/your-new-australian-flag-designs/4484312

While Fomalhaut was moving further north and Acrux south, word spread through the Bronze Age trading networks of Europe that a new star would arrive to replace the one they were losing (to mark south if nothing else), and both stars became associated with rebirth. (Just as the Christians’ cross is shaped like Crux, so their fish symbol is shaped like Piscis Austrinus- the Southern FIsh). The crucial time and place was around 46 degrees North, in the early 16th century BC- Acrux and Fomalhaut had the same declination of -44d 15m in the 1560s BC according to my software/research.

Later, the association had spread throughout Europe and the Near/Middle East, but by the first century BC Fomalhaut was so much higher than Acrux around the low 30s North latitude that although the Acrux/fish/rebirth legend was still being told, the association of Fomalhaut with it was no longer obvious despite them being aware of Acrux sliding perilously towards the horizon. So it became the rebirth star all on its own-with the “wise men” trying to hold on to seeing it for s long as possible.

And Fomalhaut moved ever northwards. The legends persisted in northern parts as well, possibly aided by Celtic migrations and southern Europeans in the Roman Army. Fomalhaut appeared over the horizon in southernmost Britain in the late Roman era (about 200AD in London), and in central England around the time the Saxons were invading (about 450AD in Birmingham).. Those stories about Jesus with King Arthur at Glastonbury holding the Holy Grail……. were an attempt to marry the appearance of the new “rebirth star” into the new religion that was being adopted.

Now check out latitude 51 degrees North around 2900 BC, when Stonehenge switched from measuring something (the Southern Cross!) to the midsummer sunrise, because Acrux was last visible when those stones were dragged there.

More Explaination:

*United States Patent 6,589,683

Also, all historians believe in the existence of a person called Jesus, irrespective of their belief or non-belief in his divinity. Otherwise most of the other figures from ancient history, civil or religious, have to be denied existence, since there is even less physical and documented evidence of their existence.

The real reason that extra CO2 is having no effect is that there is already about three times as much up there than would be needed to capture all the available photons. You cannot create energy. Carbon dioxide is not energy – photons are.

The IPCC based their argument on laboratory tests which had enough photons for the amount of CO2 they had in their test. This was nothing like the real world.

Also, they overlooked obvious cycles in temperatures which can be proven statistically with Fourier transforms. They made their predictions when the 60 year cycle was rising between 1970 and 2000. Now it is starting to fall, though the long-term (934 year cycle) will continue to rise but only by about 0.3 degrees and only until 2059.

I don’t care if the majority of scientific opinion is that CO2 raises temperatures. The majority is wrong. CO2 went up linearly whereas temperatures are going down slightly since 2003. The cycles predict that 2059 will be the maximum and then there will be a steady decline for 450 years. We are at a similar point to about the year AD 1077 and heading for a little ice age after the next 60 year mini peak in 2059 (60 years after the 1999 peak which was 60 years after the 1939 peak and 60 years after the 1879-1880 peak etc.

See the new theory at my site http://earth-climate.com

I know you will be reluctant to be branded a denier, but at least recognise the fact that the current temperatures are not rising and ask what’s the urgency? Temperatures won’t rise until about 2029 and by then the IPCC will have to admit they got it wrong.

This is what will happen to temperatures: http://earth-climate.com/planetcycles.jpg and it is actually based on planet orbits.

ETS is useless.